Thursday, August 21, 2008

My New Website and Blog Have Launched

(Danville, California)
 
    Dear Readers:
 
    I am thrilled to announce that my brand new blog and website have launched at: www.MarkCurtisMedia.com. This comes just in time for my coverage of the Democratic Convention in Denver, then the Republican Convention in St. Paul.
 
    The new blog will be much more interactive and will feature many more multimedia options, including more video! It was built and will be operated by Dagaz Solutions of Danville, California. www.dagazsolutions.com.
 
    The new website will also allow visitors to subscribe to my RSS feed, and we will now be able to accept paid advertising!
 
    Don't forget, MarkCurtisMedia.com is a full-service media and public relations company. We produce videos, publicity campaigns, commercial voice-overs, media writing in all styles, and media training!
 
    I am looking forward to my latest political travels, too! Remember, you can find all our information and stories in one easy, central location.  Tell your friends, and switch to: www.MarkCurtisMedia.com.
 
 




It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Has Russia Forced Obama's Hand?

(Danville, California)
 
    While we await the official announcement by Barack Obama of his chosen running mate, I wonder whether the foreign policy developments of the past ten days have forced his hand. Today a new poll shows John McCain leading Obama nationally by five percentage points. That's a stunning turnaround for McCain.
 
    Why the improvement in McCain's numbers? Well, maybe his longer resume, military credentials and life experience matter to many independent and previously undecided voters.
 
    No one foresaw Russia's invasion of Georgia. Many people had thought Vladimir Putin was at least a "reasonable" Russian/Soviet leader, if there is really such a thing.
In any case, I wonder whether now Obama has only one choice for VP, that being Delaware Senator Joe Biden. Biden, who chairs the crucial Foreign Relations Committee, has thirty-six years in the Senate. He may be about to become the "Dick Cheney" of the Democratic Party,
 
    I say that not because Biden and Cheney share a similar world view. They don't. But what they hold in common is deep Washington and foreign-policy experience, and each has begrudging respect from the other side of the political aisle. Cheney was brought in to shore up George W. Bush's perceived lack of experience, and he made people feel more comfortable with the top of the ticket. Obama has similar problems, and his picking Sen. Evan Bayh or Gov. Tim Kaine at this point won't ease the concerns of the voters.
 
    As CBS political analyst Jeff Greenfield recently noted, Obama is looking for a "graybeard," a respected party elder with a resume. Today, filmmaker Michael Moore suggested Obama pick Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, daughter of the late President. Is he crazy? Obama needs a Darth Vader more than he needs a Camelot!
 
    Oddly, Vladimir Putin may have forced Obama's hand in this decision. Suddenly John McCain's steely-eyed temperament looks more reassuring than Obama's willingness to negotiate with wayward foreign leaders. We'll see how voters judge this moment.
 
    It's what I call "the politics of unforeseen events." Things no one is expecting can turn the landscape 180 degrees in politics, and this is one of those times. Two weeks ago, Evan Bayh might have been a shoe-in for the VP sweepstakes. Today Joe Biden looks like the all-but-certain pick.
 
    The announcement could come at any moment. Check in often at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com. And remember! The all new blog is coming soon, as I get ready to hit the road to both political conventions.




It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Mark Curtis Speaks with "Greg and Rosie" on KGO


-jpg

If you would like to download this mp3 to your computer or your iPod right click the link above, then download.

KGO Radio

Saturday, August 16, 2008

California 11th Congressional Race Heats Up

(San Ramon, California)

    Political observers are calling the California 11th one of the closest Congressional races in the nation. Last week I interviewed incumbent Rep. Jerry McNerney. This week we caught up with Republican challenger Dean Andal. The topic of our first "blog video debate" was the nation's energy policy. Click below for Dean Andal's response to McNerney's video last week:

    Dean Andal is a former member of the California Assembly. The respected Rothenberg Political Report currently rates this race as "Toss Up - Tilts Democrat."

    I will be attending both political conventions beginning next Sunday, August 24, in Denver. To coincide with that, the all-new "Mark Curtis Media" political blog is coming soon. Keep checking back at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.







Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.

Friday, August 15, 2008

Comcast Newsmaker part 2

Comcast Newsmaker part 2

Comcast Newsmaker part 2

Did Edwards Cost Hillary the Nomination?

(Danville, California)
 
    In politics it's always interesting to speculate, especially on "what might have been." There has been a lot of chatter this past week about whether John Edwards and his affair might have cost Hillary Clinton the nomination.
 
    The theory works like this: Had the press reported the suspected affair (and it now appears some mainstream news outlets knew about it), then Edwards would have been forced to drop out, even before the Iowa caucuses. The theory further postulates that Clinton would have picked up most of Edwards's supporters, launching her past Obama.
 
    My analysis of this consists of yes; no; and maybe.
 
YES: Obama was clearly the most liberal of the three candidates, with Edwards and Clinton operating more to his right. In addition, Clinton could have picked up on Edwards's appeal to rural and white Southern voters, a constituency she did well with in later primaries. But would it have helped her in Iowa?
 
NO: Some are making the assumption that white voters who backed Edwards would have simply shifted over to Clinton because she is white. This is a bad assumption and - quite honestly - not very deep political analysis. To assume everything is race-based is a mistake. After all, Obama won Iowa, a state that is 97 percent white.
You also have to look at a candidate's negatives. Some people were turned off by Hillary simply because of "Clinton fatigue." Her husband had his eight years, and now it was time to move on to someone else in the party. Obama was the candidate of "change," a word that really resonated. Edwards also ran as a Washington outsider who was going to shake things up. Had Edward dropped out early, it's plausible a lot of those "change" voters would have gone to Obama, not Clinton, especially those voters under 30.
 
MAYBE: Still, I am realist. Iowa was NOT a landslide by any means. The final count was: Obama 37.6 percent; Edwards 29.7 percent; and Clinton 29.5 percent. Remove Edwards, and Hillary would have finished a much closer second at the very least. She was an upset winner in New Hampshire, and that gave her candidacy more life and momentum. Had she won both Iowa and New Hampshire, her campaign would have had that air of inevitability that she so badly wanted. That momentum might have caused a better result for her on Super Tuesday, sealing the deal.
 
The problem is, we'll never know. We spend a lot of time speculating in politics. If only there weren't voting irregularities in Illinois in 1960, Nixon would have won; if only Ross Perot didn't run in 1992, Bush Sr. would have been re-elected; if only Ralph Nader hadn't run in 2000, Al Gore might be President today. The list could go on.
 
My point is, what's done is done. There aren't any "do overs" in politics (and indeed in most of life). We are simply left to wonder.
 
My "all new" blog is coming soon! Keep checking in for details at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.
 
 




Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.

Monday, August 11, 2008

New Media Is the Future at Every Turn

(Danville, California)
 
    They are hungry, and they are hunting us down at every twist and turn in this campaign. No, I am not talking about the voracious appetites of Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich. I 'm talking about the "New Media!"
 
    Last night I received an email from Barack Obama's campaign. The promise: If I sign up for an email alert or a text message alert, then I will be among the first to be notified by text when he picks his VP running mate. Supposedly, I and a few of his closest thousands of friends will be the first to know, even before the mainstream media. Of course this "exclusive" to my cell phone should last all of ten seconds, because every reporter in the nation is being invited to sign up.
 
    If you want to sign up, just dial 62262 from your cell phone and text the message: "VP." (Standard text rates apply.)
 
    Sure, it's a clever gimmick; but it is generating buzz. It was all over CNN today; and when I spoke to the Danville Rotary Club today, people were asking about it. So while the big, "old media" dinosaurs keep eating dandelions next to the freeway, the "new media" race cars are speeding past, down the freeway. The future is now, on the Internet, and the Obama campaign has been way out in front of everyone else. UC Berkeley has launched the Center for New Media, and millions in donations are pouring in from people like my friend Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist (www.craigslist.org). I took a graduate course there last summer, and it was VERY eye-opening. The old world of newspapers, radio and TV will either have to adapt or fade away.
 
    Speaking of new media, the "all new" Mark Curtis political blog is coming your way soon, just in time for the political conventions. Watch for updates at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.
 




Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.

Mark Curtis on KGO Radio


-jpg

If you would like to download this mp3 to your computer or your iPod right click the link above, then download.

KGO Radio

Saturday, August 9, 2008

Political Analyst Mark Curtis on "Comcast Newsmakers" Part 2

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself help center | e-mail options | report spam

markcurtismedia has shared a video with you on YouTube:

Comcast Newsmaker part 2
© 2008 YouTube, LLC

California Congressional Race Tops in the Nation

(Dublin, California)

 
    The 11th District Congressional seat from California is considered by many political watches as one of the most competitive in the country. A few weeks ago, I spoke with Republican challenger Dean Andal. Today I caught up with first term Democrat Rep. Jerry McNerney at "meet and greet" with voters outside the Lowe's store in Dublin, California.

 
    Congressman McNerney gave his views on energy policy and the election. CLICK ON TODAY's VIDEO INTERVIEW:

 
    We'll keep an eye on this race, and in the coming weeks talk again with former State Assemblyman Dean Andal about his chances. Right now the well-respected "Rothenberg Political Report" rates this race as "Toss Up - Tilts Democrat."
 
    The "all-new" Mark Curtis political blog is coming soon, with more videos and interview segments, as I get ready for the political conventions in Denver and St. Paul. The future of journalism is NOW on the Internet. Check in often at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.

 







Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.

Friday, August 8, 2008

Random Thoughts on the Election

(Danville, California)
 
    I was a subscriber to "Rolling Stone" magazine for 20 years, and always enjoyed the "Random Notes" column, which was just a hodge-podge of notes and brief items from the music world, instead of being a full-fledged article. There was lots of amusing stuff.
 
    Some days I have dozens of thoughts on politics, but none that gels into a column. Still, I've got to write something! So, with that in mind, here are today's "Random Thoughts" on politics 2008, which I hope will be a semi-regular feature here:
 
-So John Edwards had an affair. He wasn't going to be the VP running mate anyway (because he can't carry North Carolina), but he had a decent shot at Attorney General. Now, that's gone too.
 
-Media outlets are making a big deal out of the fact that Bill Clinton will address the convention Wednesday night. Are they seriously surprised? The big story would have been leaving him off the agenda. You've got to be kidding! Love 'em or hate 'em, he's been the face of the Democratic Party for 16 years.
 
-Paris Hilton is now making fun of John McCain by calling him a "wrinkly, white-haired guy." Better check your family history, Paris. If it wasn't for a "wrinkly old man" named Conrad Hilton, you'd be a poor zero, instead of a rich zero.
 
-Barack Obama is grossly underestimating the female backlash against his campaign. Pick Hillary for VP, Senator, or you might "tank" worse than Dukakis in the tank.
 
-Love him or hate him, George W. Bush is the only modern U.S. President to face down radical Islam. Sorry, presidential fans of both parties; but Clinton, Bush Sr., Reagan, Carter and Ford all failed on that account. The outcome may not really be known for another decade.
 
-The latest "hot" rumor for VP on the GOP side is former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Don't bet the mortgage on it. (See Edwards item above.)
 
-I doubt it will work, but I give Barack Obama a lot of credit for seriously considering Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) as his running mate. It used to be "conventional wisdom" that you don't pick someone from a neighboring state, but Bill Clinton and Al Gore blew that theory away in 1992.
 
Anyway, more of these nuggets to come, before, during and after the conventions!
 
I will be on the ground in Denver for the DNC on August 24, followed by the RNC in St. Paul, on August 31. Check in often at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.
 




Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.

Mark Curtis Speaks with KGO Radio

-jpg

KGO Radio

Sunday, August 3, 2008

VP Short Lists Short Change Women

(Santa Clara, California)
 
    Today I find myself at the National American Miss Pageant in Santa Clara, California. My daughter is one of the contestants for Miss Teen California, having finished second runner-up in last year's junior teen competition. Lest you think this is a "beauty pageant," think again. The young women in this pageant are skilled in academics and community service. They learn poise, confidence, public speaking and charity, among other qualities. In short, these young ladies are the leaders of tomorrow. They are an impressive bunch.
 
    As I am watching this all play out, a question begs from the world of politics. Apparently no women in either party are under serious consideration any longer for Vice-president. Why? Sen. Hillary Clinton, it would appear, is no longer being considered by Barack Obama. And John McCain appears to be taking a pass on Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison. I think this is a critical mistake.
 
    For now, we hear the Democratic finalists are Gov. Tim Kaine (D-VA); Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) and Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE). On the Republican side, the rumor mill has former Gov. Mitt Romney (R-MA); Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA); and Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-MN).
 
    Here  are some thumbnail sketches with pros and cons: Tim Kaine, Pros: Virginia may be a "toss-up," state; and if the Dems win, they could take the White House. Cons: Kaine is in his mid 40's, in his first term, and has zero foreign policy experience. Do those weaknesses sound just like Obama's? Evan Bayh, Pros: Long-time Washington insider whose dad was a Senator; some foreign experience and some executive experience, as he was a governor. Cons: He may not be able to carry the solidly conservative state of Indiana. Joe Biden, Pros: 36 years in U.S. Senate, with deep foreign policy expertise. He could give Obama "Dick Cheney" type depth on the bench. Cons: Young voters who came out in droves for Obama have no idea who Biden is (or Sam Nunn, or Bob Kerrey, etc).
 
    Now to the Republican side: Mitt Romney, Pros: Solid conservatives love him. He has executive experience in government, business and the nonprofit sector. Cons: Can he carry Massachusetts? It's iffy at best. You MUST win your home state. Just ask Vice-president John Edwards and President Al Gore.
Eric Cantor, Pros: At 45, he's a young, conservative, energetic fundraiser, who could keep Virginia in the GOP win column. Cons: With four terms in the House, he's only slightly more qualified than Obama.
Tim Pawlenty, Pros: Believe it or not, the liberal-leaning Minnesota may be "in play" this year. If the GOP takes the Gopher State, that could mean the keys to the White House. Cons: Yes, Minnesota borders Canada, but that's hardly serious foreign policy experience.
 
    The conclusion I draw from all this is simple. None of these men is head and shoulders above many of the prominent women who have been mentioned on both sides. Female voters cast more ballots than men. Many women are still angry that Hillary Clinton's thunder was stolen by Obama. There could be a backlash if Obama picks a man. So my advice to John McCain would be: Let Obama pick his VP first; and if it's another man, your short list should be: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX); Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK); or Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME).
 
    The bottom line: The candidates need to send a message to young women, like those in this pageant today, that emerging young women will be taken seriously as candidates for leadership at all levels of society, including the White House or a heart beat away. Both parties need to end this cynical ploy by which they claim women are being considered for VP, yet no woman even makes it to the semifinals.
 
    Three weeks from today, I hit the road again for Denver, then St. Paul. Check back for full convention coverage at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.
 
 
    




Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.

Saturday, August 2, 2008

The Politics and Goodwill of Athletic Competition

(Stanford, California)
 
    The Summer Olympic Games begin in Beijing a week from today; but, closer to home, Olympic organizers are gearing up for a different kind of games - an event we may see far more of.
 
    At a news conference at Stanford University today, details of the "Summer National Senior Games" were announced. The Bay Area (and specifically Palo Alto) will be hosting the games from August 1 through 15, 2009. Yes, opening ceremonies are a year from today.
 
    "Big deal," you say. "We want the real Olympics!" Well, this may be a foreshadowing of things to come. Next year 12,000 athletes from around the nation will be competing in eighteen medal sports and seven demonstration sports around the Bay. That should translate to an economic impact of more than $35 million dollars to the local economy. That ain't bad. "This will be bigger than Beijing," said Anne Warner Cribbs, president of the local organizing committee. "More athletes will be competing." Cribbs knows a little something about this business; she represented the U.S. in swimming in the 1960 Olympics.
 
    Local elected officials are thrilled about all the business coming here.
 
    The point is, most people are living longer and healthier lives, so why not compete in athletic games for  medals. And that means this concept could become big business. After all, as I pointed out at  the news conference today, people scoffed as the Seniors' Golf Tour when it was first launched. Many thought it would fail. It's now a multimillion-dollar enterprise, with a TV contract and huge respect and notoriety. Why? Because people like good competitive golf, whether it's Tiger Woods in his 30's or Jack Nicklaus in his 70's.
 
    The same thing could happen to these Senior Games! While it is primarily a U.S. competition for now, the games will be expanding into Europe, with Fall Games in the Netherlands in September of 2009 with upwards of 5,000 athletes. Could further international competition be far behind? "My dream is that one day we will have World Senior Games," said National Senior Games President, Phil Godfrey, "that it will be on par with the Olympics."
 
    Senior swimmer Daniela Barnea echoed those international hopes. "I grew up in Israel, where there were no pools to swim in," Barnea said. "I got here and joined the master's program. I enjoy swimming. I enjoy the workout."
 
    So where do the politics come in? Well, promoting international cooperation and goodwill has always been a goal of the Olympics, even if that has at times fallen short. It's interesting to note that these Senior Games will have an environmental emphasis and goals. For example, at the games last year in Louisville, the athletes were given 50,000 plastic water bottles. Not this time. Each will be given a stainless steel water container, and there will be so-called "hydration stations" all over campus. The idea is to cut down on trash and pollution. "These games will be green," said organizer Anne Warner Cribbs.
 
    The games also promote good global health. Obesity in America is a big problem. Smoking in Asia is a fast- growing threat. Any promotion of good health could counter those trends. As I say, the spirit of international cooperation is at the heart of these efforts. "I am a zealot for health, exercise and fitness," said Santa Clara County Supervisor Liz Kniss. Palo Alto Mayor Larry Klein echoed the public health example that will be set. "There are going to be 12,000 people here competing," Klein said. "We want this for our society so that we don't have an epidemic of Type II Diabetes."
 
    The sweetest and most poignant moment came today from senior basketball player Don De Lutis. He lamented that his team of all-stars would now be playing in the 75-to-79 age division. Two of his 74-year- old players will have to play for a different squad. "Hopefully, we'll win the gold medal next year," said De Lutis. "At least that's our goal."
 
 
    The games at Stanford next year need two things: Moral support and volunteers. The first part is easy. ALL events will be free to the public to watch. That should bring people out and at least generate some revenue through vendor and food sales. The second part is more challenging. Organizers need 4,000 volunteers to help put on these games. Sign up if you can. More information is available at www.2009seniorgames.org.
 
    I consider the two political conventions as "the Olympics of politics," and they are coming soon. I will be in both Denver and St. Paul, starting August 24. Check in often at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.
 
 
 




Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

"Press Release Wars" Are Downright Silly

(Danville, California)
 
    OK, folks! I am going to start sharing with you some of the downright silliness of this campaign (heck, just about all campaigns). Since I am on the press e-mail list for the Obamas, the McCains, and yes even still, the Clintons, I thought I might share some of the more ridiculous offerings.
 
    Today it was former President Bill Clinton, trying to entice us to play a "lottery" of sorts, so we could dine with Hillary (and help retire her multi-million dollar campaign debt). The press release is entitled "The Person I Most Want to Spend Time With." Seriously, that's the title (or the punch line; make your own joke!) Anyway, here's what his email said:
 
"Dear Mark,

During the campaign, Hillary and I didn't have the chance to eat together much because we were usually on the trail in different states. Now that the campaign's over, I'm glad we can share more meals again.  

Of all the people I've had the privilege to break bread with, the person I most enjoy is still Hillary.

Now you have a chance to have dinner with her. And if you contribute today to help Hillary retire that pesky campaign debt, you and a guest might be sitting down to dinner with her soon. I think you should go for it and enter today. 

Join Hillary for dinner. Make a contribution today.  

Trust me on this one. If you're the lucky winner, it will be a night you'll really enjoy and one to remember.

All my best,
Bill Clinton
Bill Clinton"
 
In fairness, some of the McCain and Obama offerings are equally as touching. Those chapters are coming soon to a blog near you! www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.
 




Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Let them Debate: The Barr/Nader Factor

(Lafayette, California)
 
    I had the great honor of speaking to the Lafayette Rotary Club this week about Campaign 2008.  Every year I speak to more than 25 Rotary Clubs around the Bay Area. These are folks committed to community service and are true leaders. How Rotary has served around the world for over 100 years, especially its effort to eradicate Polio, is remarkable. Roto-plast and other great programs have treated thousands with birth defects, too. It's a wonderful group of kind, generous people.
 
    Of course, the Rotarians had lots of questions about this year's Presidential campaign; and since I had been on the campaign trail from January through June, there was a lot to discuss.
 
    One Rotarian asked me about the viability of third-party candidates and whether I think there should be third-party candidates in the debates. GREAT question, and one I love to talk about.
 
    An Associated Press poll in June had it:
 
    Obama   47%
    McCain   43%
    Nader       6%
 
    A Zogby Poll in early July had it:
 
    Obama 44%
    McCain   38%
    Barr        6%
 
    I have always believed that a Democracy is simply a "marketplace of ideas." If you put an idea (or candidate) forward, and get the majority to support it, you may prevail. It's not a guarantee, but it has worked well in this country for more than 230 years.
 
    I am a supporter of a viable third option. In 1992, Ross Perot garnered 19 percent of the popular vote. In 1998, pro-wrestler-turned-Mayor Jesse Ventura won the Governor's race in Minnesota. While I did not support either, I do support people having a choice. In 1980, I liked John Anderson; and he got my vote.
 
    My point is....choice! We have nothing to lose by looking at all options. With that in mind, I believe that if any candidates are polling above 5 percent, let them participate in the fall debates. In 1980, there was great turmoil over whether to include John Anderson. The same goes for 1992 and Ross Perot. How about Pat Buchanan in 1996 and Ralph Nader in 2000?
 
    Oh, I know the arguments: Conservatives believe Ross Perot cost George H.W. Bush reelection in 1992; and liberals blame Ralph Nader for Al Gore's defeat in 2000. They argue that the third-party candidates should not have run because they pulled from Democratic and Republican Party constituencies.
 
    That's crazy! A candidate's choice should be on whether they attract votes, not whether they draw votes away from another person. This year, Republican Ron Paul was polling 10% in the New Hampshire primary, yet Fox News Channel blocked him from the debate. Why? Are we that afraid of new and different ideas? Don't we trust ourselves to reject ideas that might not work?

This year is interesting, as Libertarian Bob Barr may pull votes from John McCain. Independent Ralph Nader and the Green Party's Cynthia McKinney may pull votes from liberals. Maybe they will just cancel each other out.

Who knows? We'll never know if the corporate media and major parties "systematically" lock them out by not given them serious coverage, or by not giving them a place on the stage. Let's make it a policy: If any third party candidate is polling better than 5% on Labor Day, let them join McCain and Obama in the fall debates.

What's the harm? After all, this IS a Democracy!

I am busy getting ready for the Democratic Convention in Denver and the Republican Convention in St.Paul. Check in often at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Immigration Policy a National Embarassment

(San Francisco, California)
 
    A shocking tragedy in the wonderful "City by the Bay" may finally put the illegal immigration issue on the national radar screen. And it's about time! Most of the Presidential candidates largely ignored it this year; and - now that we are down to McCain and Obama - they are still ignoring it. The press needs to start insisting on answers, and not just accepting the "policy position handouts" that all campaigns are guilty of. Running the country by "press release" on immigration or any other issue simply won't work.
 
    Just ask Danielle Bologna, of San Francisco. Today she is a widow with two dead sons, thanks to Washington's utter indifference to illegal immigration and to San Francisco's blatant flouting of immigration law. San Francisco turned a blind eye towards a criminal alien, and now three family members are dead. That's an outrage.
 
    Here's what happened: On June 22, a man named Tony Bologna was shot to death near his San Francisco home. His son Michael, age 20, and another son Matthew, 16, were shot to death as well. The violence appears to have been precipitated by some type of road-rage incident.
 
    The murder suspect now in custody is 21-year-old Edwin Ramos of El Salvador, who was convicted of two violent felonies as a juvenile, but was never deported as an illegal immigrant. Why? Because, for some reason that defies explanation, San Francisco has a policy of not deporting violent illegals who are juveniles. San Francisco is a self-proclaimed "sanctuary city," meaning it does not obey or enforce most federal immigration laws. Cooperation between federal agents and city police is nil (much to the dismay of many honest SFPD cops, who take their pledge to enforce the law seriously, but aren't allowed to do so).
 
    By the way, lest you get the impression that Mr. Ramos was a petty juvenile delinquent, here's what he was convicted of doing. The first conviction was when Ramos and some known gang members beat a man mercilessly on a city bus - a beating which, thank God, was captured on the bus's security video camera. Ramos's second crime is even more unspeakable. He attacked a pregnant woman on the street and tried to steal her purse. For this he gets sanctuary?
 
    So by this time, after two violent felony adjudications, you'd think someone would have called the "feds," but no such luck. According to the County of San Francisco's Juvenile Probation Department, "Probation officers shall not discriminate in any fashion against minors based on their immigration status."
 
    By the way, for all those who love to constantly beat up on the news media, I hope some will tip their hats to the "San Francisco Chronicle" and reporter Jaxon Van Derbeken for unearthing this shocking story. It's Journalism 101 at its finest, all too seldom seen anymore in the world of "infotainment" that media executives claim is "news." But I digress.
 
    In any case, I hate to use a cliche, but this story is just the tip of the iceberg. No one is really talking about illegal immigration policy on a serious level, especially in the Presidential campaign. Much of that lack probably stems from the illegal immigration bill that died in Congress last year. The bill was widely criticized by liberals as too tough on border enforcement, and it was widely attacked by conservatives who thought it provided "citizenship through amnesty" for too many illegals. So, both ends of the political spectrum are to blame for stopping a possible solution. It wasn't a perfect bill by any stretch, but doing nothing is hardly good public policy on any issue.
 
    Of course, with any policy crisis we always get the quick fix. San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom has now rescinded the policy (which, fair to say, he did not create); and city leaders have told the "Chronicle" that ten juvenile offenders have been referred to immigration agents for possible deportation.
 
    For Danielle Bologna that will likely provide little comfort as she buries her husband and sons. Mayor Newsom has officially "closed the barn door, after the horses escaped."  American politics always seems to run "a day late, and a dollar short" these days. The response to Hurricane Katrina from the state, local and federal level was a case study in that inadequacy three years ago. Today, San Francisco takes this year's prize for inept government.
 
    Hopefully, there will be a lot of debate over illegal immigration this year as the campaign heats up. There will be talk of border fences, guest worker programs and "paths" to citizenship. That's all well and good, but any bill that Obama or McCain signs into law should have one clear provision: ALL illegals, adult or juvenile, with felony convictions must face mandatory deportation. Cities, such as San Francisco, which ignore the law should have federal funds withheld. That might get their attention.
 
    As Danielle Bologna tearfully pointed out to Greta Van Susteren during a TV interview tonight, fixing the law won't bring her family back. And, as for illegal immigrants in the U.S, "They have more rights than we do," Bologna said. 
 
    It is hoped that illegal immigration will be up for serious discussion at both the Democratic and Republican National Conventions next month. I will be in Denver and St. Paul to report. Check in at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.
    




Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today.

Friday, July 18, 2008

Obama Foreign Trip "About Time" for Many Reasons

(Danville, California)
 
    You might think it is the "second coming." The Internet and TV networks and newspapers (and MANY blogs) are filled with talk of Barack Obama's trip to Iraq and Afghanistan. The coverage is a bit "over the top," and he has not even arrived yet. I'll try to dissect some of the conflicting opinions about this trip in a moment, but first some initial thoughts.
 
    I think the most important point here is that nothing bad can come from Obama's trip. Seeing things firsthand can be eye-opening, with a lot more information than can be gleaned from a stale Congressional hearing in an air-conditioned room with preplanned testimony. This guy might possibly become Commander-in-Chief, so he had best get familiar with the troops now. As we saw in the movie "Charlie Wilson's War," the Congressman was profoundly changed by what he saw in person. (OK, I know it was a Hollywood depiction and was embellished, but the point is well taken).
 
    There are various facets to the debate over Obama's trip. One political blogger argues that John McCain dared Obama to go and that now Obama is "one up" on McCain for calling his bluff. Sorry, but this might be the silliest argument on the table. First of all, it presumes that Obama is going only because of the taunts from McCain. Folks, Obama is going because he has to go! Can you imagine his trying to be a serious candidate in November without going to Iraq?
 
    So, this trip is a matter of necessity, not choice; and, all politics aside, it's a matter of grave national security.
 
    Yes, there is a political equation. I am not naive. Obama simply can't win in the fall without this trip. His military and foreign policy credentials pale so in comparison to McCain's, that Obama's inexperience raises serious doubts about his viability as President. (That said, I still argue that this election will be decided by the state of the U.S. economy, not by foreign policy, just as happened in 1980, in the midst of international strife).
 
    Still, given the timing, Republicans will try to have a heyday over Obama's visit. He should have gone there months ago, they will argue. The trip may change Obama's troop pullout plan, they may further argue. On the other hand, with Prime Minister Al-Malaki now searching for some sort of timetable for our withdrawal, the Obama visit may play into his hands, given Obama's pledge for specific troop drawdowns by specific dates.
 
    So, maybe it's a fact-finding trip; maybe it's a policy trip; and, yes, maybe it's a campaign trip. It may be all of the above but, given the time and proximity to next month's conventions, I'll defer to another colleague from Wisconsin, who may be the best analyst in the business on either end of the political spectrum. "It's very hard to argue that this is not political," said Jeff Greenfield, political analyst for CBS News, on Friday.
 
    I can't wait to get to Denver for the Democratic National Convention on August 25, followed by the Republican National Convention in St. Paul on August 31. Check in at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.




Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Polls Are a Mixed Bag Right Now

(Danville, California)
 
    Most polls continue to put Democrat Barack Obama in the lead in the Presidential race. However, the gap is closing. Polls that showed him leading John McCain by 12 to 15 points just a few weeks ago now show that lead all but gone. Why is that? Well, for starters, many of those polls were taken right after the dramatic and historic primary season ended. The euphoria over Obama's razor-thin win over Hillary Clinton and the fact that McCain had won his nomination three months earlier, meant that McCain was knocked out of the headlines for a good stretch.
 
    Now that people have just two choices (Okay, I know Nader, Barr, McKinney, et. al., are hovering out there.), the polls may tighten further.
 
Here are some of the latest numbers:
 
POLL:                                      Obama:                  McCain:
 
Newsweek                                44                            41
Quinnipiac                                50                            41
ABC/Washington Post               49                            46
Real Clear Politics                    47                            43
 
    The key here is the undecided vote. As many as 15 percent of voters have yet to make up their minds, so the election could swing either way. Also, most polls have a margin of error of +/- 4 percentage points. That could make these polls essentially dead even.
 
    Bad News for McCain: An AOL poll shows that six percent of American homes have no "land line" phone. They rely on cell phones only. Most of those numbers are unlisted, making this mostly young, 18-to-30-year-old group unavailable for phone polling. As we saw in the primaries, this voting demographic heavily favors Obama.
 
    Bad News for Obama: A variety of polls still indicate that 20 to 25 percent of Hillary Clinton supporters are planning to vote for McCain, or they will just simply stay home. Many are still angry, believing Obama took "skips in line" ahead of Hillary Clinton when it was "her turn" to be the nominee. These people are still mad six weeks later. They could be decisive.
 
    Battleground states: There are eleven in all. It's a toss-up in eight right now: Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Hampshire, Florida, Virginia, Nevada and New Mexico. Obama has wider margins in Wisconsin and Colorado. McCain has a leg up in Missouri.
 
    The bottom line: This race is wide open! I have heard too many McCain backers ready to "throw in the towel." And I have heard too many Obama supporters talk of a certain victory. Neither group is right!
 
    I am gearing up for the Democratic Convention in Denver and the Republican Convention in St. Paul. Until then, keep checking in at www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.
    




Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Tony Snow 1955-2008

(Danville, California)
 
    First it was Tim Russert; now it's Tony Snow. One was unexpected; the other we kind of knew was coming. Still, both deaths are a shock to the journalism community. Russert was 58; Snow, 53. Both died much too young, well before their prime. Death is hard to take at any time; but, in a Presidential election year, when we all expected to see a lot of Tim and Tony, missing them is even harder.
 
    I had the good fortune to know both men, not as good friends, but as professional colleagues. One was a tried-and-true Democrat; the other, a hard-core Republican. I respected them both deeply for their passion, their intellect and their integrity.
 
     I have great memories of interviewing Tony a number of times when he was host of "Fox News Sunday." We would have him on KTVU the Friday before, for a preview.
 
    Ironically, the last time I spoke with both Snow and Russert was in January. Tim was at the Iowa Caucuses in Des Moines. Three weeks later, I had dinner with Tony in Concord, CA, when I   introduced him as the featured speaker before a crowd of 500 at the annual Contra Costa USA Dinner. He was fantastic! We had a lot in common. We were both professional journalists. We had both worked in politics. We had both played in rock bands in our 20s. We had even worked as stand-up comedians; and we had both lost our moms to cancer when we were teenagers. Despite all the ups and downs of life, we counted our blessings.
 
    We talked a lot that night, and Tony was especially encouraging, because I had just lost my job two weeks before and was professionally devastated. He was so encouraging and supportive. He had lost media jobs, too. He was thrilled that I decided to strike out on my own and cover the Presidential race as a freelancer, because he knew it would be an uphill fight in the world of entrenched media empires.
 
    Days later came this note to me in the mail. It may be hard to read, so I'll transcribe it: "Dear Mark: It was a real treat to meet you in person at last, and to get time to talk about everything from stand-up to politics to the wild and ruthless business of broadcasting. As one who has been through the 'getting fired' business, let me share one consoling thought: Something better, and probably something unexpected, will come your way. That just seems to be how these things work. Your talent, drive and ability will shine through. I know how tough it is now, but hang in there: It will get better. Thanks for doing such a great job last night. I hope our paths will cross again soon. Best, Tony."
 
    Here was a guy who was losing his life to cancer, but he was consoling me for losing my job on TV. That dose of humility and reality will carry me a long way. I will treasure the handwritten note forever.
   
    But my greatest memory is of March 22, 2007, when Tony held the White House briefing the day after Elizabeth and John Edwards had announced the return of her cancer in the midst of his Presidential run. Here is what Tony said to a national TV audience from the briefing room:
 
    "A couple of things up top. As you probably know, Senator John Edwards and his wife, Elizabeth, have announced that she has a recurrence of cancer, and that they will still continue a full and vigorous campaign. First, our thoughts and prayers are with Elizabeth Edwards. Also, as somebody who has been through this, Elizabeth Edwards is setting a powerful example for a lot of people, and a good and positive one. She has been on top of diagnosis and followup. When you have cancer it's very important to keep checking. She's being aggressive. She's living an active life. And a positive attitude, prayers, and people you love are always a very good addition to any kind of medicine you have. So for Elizabeth Edwards, good going; our prayers are with you."
 
    Snow also said, "When you see an Elizabeth Edwards saying, 'I'm going to embrace life and I'm going to move forward,' that is a wonderful thing." 

    From the other camp, came a response. John Edwards told "People" magazine that he and Elizabeth were praying for Snow, adding: "Tony has been an incredible example for people living with cancer and cancer survivors."
 
    That was simply an exchange of kindness, class and leadership from both side of the aisle. Cancer is an equal opportunity killer. It could care less whether you are Republican, Democrat, Green, etc. When it strikes public figures, they have two choices: Wall themselves up in privacy and self-pity, or become public advocates for education, early detection, research and beyond. The nation is fortunate that the Snows and Edwardses chose the latter.
 
    Tony was optimistic about his prognosis. In our last conversation, he talked about living long enough to see his kids grow up and provide him with grandchildren. Feeling equally optimistic, I invited him back to Contra Costa County to tell us all about those grandchildren, and we would dissect the political world at the same time. I can't believe that conversation was just six months ago, and now he's gone. He was so strong, and so ready to keep fighting.
 
    Like Tim Russert, Tony Snow was a devout family man who loved his wife and children. Today our prayers are with Tony's wife Jill, their two daughters and their son. God Bless them! With Sunday upon us, I can't help thinking that Russert and Snow are in Heaven, hosting a spiritual Sunday joint edition of "Meet the Press" and "Fox News Sunday" from the great beyond. What a show it would be!




Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!

Friday, July 11, 2008

"Foot in Mouth Disease" Infects Campaign Trail

(Danville, California)
 
    Good Lord! Where do I begin? The campaign missteps are coming so fast that I feel I need dance lessons. (Or maybe the candidates do!)  
 
    
Today it was former U.S. Senator Phil Gramm (R-TX), a surrogate for Sen. John McCain,  who - during an interview with "The Washington Times" - called the United States "a nation of whiners" in a "mental recession."
People paying $ 4.50 a gallon for gas are probably not really thrilled about being called "whiners." And the "mental recession" remark smacks of Jimmy Carter's infamous "malaise speech," which was likely the lowest emotional moment in U.S. Presidential history. People don't like being told they are "losers," whether it's by a Republican or a Democrat. Such remarks helped lead to Carter's landslide defeat to Ronald Reagan in 1980. We want to be uplifted, not castigated.
 
    Not to be outdone, Phil Gramm has plenty of competition from the Rev. Jesse Jackson. At the end of a Fox News interview this week, Jackson said (assuming the microphones had been cut): "See, Barack been, um, talking down to black people on this faith based .... I wanna cut his nuts (testicles) off ... Barack ... he's talking down to black people." The fact that Sen. Obama has been chastising black males who father children, then abandon their families, is laudable. That he's calling on churches to help is an acknowledgment that he knows they fill a big need in the social services gap. Entertainer Bill Cosby (who holds a Doctorate in Education) has been attacked for similar remarks. Why do people attack the messenger when they don't like the message?
 
    Much to my dismay, some U.S. media outlets are "self-censoring" Jackson's remarks. This "namby-pamby" journalistic nonsense needs to end now! Report what he said, and let people make their own interpretation and judgement. (NOTE TO THE MEDIA: Go back and read the First Amendment in case you are confused!) There was no such restraint when then-candidates George W. Bush and Dick Cheney referred to "New York Times" reporter Adam Clymer as an "ass" during the 2000 campaign, while they stood to close to an open microphone. Just report what the candidates say, crude as it may be at times. (NOTE TO CANDIDATES: Always assume all mikes are hot!)
 
    Now, let me take a moment to defend Sen. Gramm and Rev. Jackson. They are entitled to their opinions, and - quite honestly - it's nice to hear a little candor in a prepackaged corporate sound bite world. I think both men probably truly believe their statements. Heck! That's actually refreshing from both sides. At least we know where they stand!
 
    The real problem here is that both men are surrogates for the candidates. What REALLY matters in this election is what the candidates themselves say and how they respond to questions and issues. Gramm and Jackson are not on the ballot.
 
    This year Barack Obama was nominated for the "Foot in Mouth" award when he stereotyped rural voters as gun-and-Bible-toting hicks. John McCain won his "Foot in Mouth" nomination by saying that he needed to be educated about the economy because his real strengths lie in military and foreign affairs. Both men were pummeled for their remarks, and that's the way it should be because THEY are the ones who could actually sit in the Oval Office.
 
    So, while we can all be amused by Jesse Jackson and Phil Gramm, (and Geraldine Ferraro, Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Rev. Pat Robertson, et. al.), it's important to keep in mind, they are not on the ballot.
 
    Let's focus on the candidates themselves and hope the "Foot in Mouth Award" does not become a category at the Oscars! It might be hard to pick a winner.
 
    In six weeks, I hit the road again for the Democratic and Republican conventions. Keep dropping by, www.MarkCurtisMedia.blogspot.com.
 




Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!